tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6686974271077547567.post2821582059993667502..comments2017-03-23T14:06:33.315+00:00Comments on Alan Spencer Photography: The National TrussAlan Spencerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02065437633709369090noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6686974271077547567.post-22938487128429637282009-07-03T13:40:46.712+01:002009-07-03T13:40:46.712+01:00Great story and one that I'm all too familiar ...Great story and one that I'm all too familiar with.<br /><br />The latest interpretation of the 'rules' is that if you pay for entry, you're bound by their terms and conditions. However, shots taken on publicly accessible areas where no fee is charged are fair game. Maybe that's right, maybe not (I'm not a lawyer), but I can't see how they can stop you photographing where no contract has been entered into. There are no signs on the gates to say "No commercial photography"<br /><br />The 'rule' that they quote is actually to stop people 'hawking' for photographic business on their property, and not specifically to stop commercial photography.<br /><br />What I would never recommend is to disguise the names with obvious spelling mistakes so they don't show up in keyword searches. Oh no. Never.<br /><br />Also, if commercial photography is not allowed, can I use the photos for editorial purposes only ;-)Stephen Barneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08427967920610532340noreply@blogger.com